<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Hottest Girls of the 80s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamigertz.org/2008/09/03/top-10-hottest-girls-of-the-80s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamigertz.org/2008/09/03/top-10-hottest-girls-of-the-80s/</link>
	<description>You #1 Jami Gertz Resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 22:07:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://jamigertz.org/2008/09/03/top-10-hottest-girls-of-the-80s/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamigertz.org/?p=161#comment-192</guid>
		<description>I agree with Troy, Jami&#039;s easily #1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Troy, Jami&#8217;s easily #1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://jamigertz.org/2008/09/03/top-10-hottest-girls-of-the-80s/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamigertz.org/?p=161#comment-191</guid>
		<description>she should have been voted #1 easily.......how can anyone disagree??????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she should have been voted #1 easily&#8230;&#8230;.how can anyone disagree??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://jamigertz.org/2008/09/03/top-10-hottest-girls-of-the-80s/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamigertz.org/?p=161#comment-190</guid>
		<description>This a very, very interesting update indeed!!!  Come on, ....#4, the girls above her were not that great and not nearly as memorable as Jami.  Jami defined the 80&#039;s and was clearly  more appealing to men at the time, that&#039;s why she landed so many roles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This a very, very interesting update indeed!!!  Come on, &#8230;.#4, the girls above her were not that great and not nearly as memorable as Jami.  Jami defined the 80&#8242;s and was clearly  more appealing to men at the time, that&#8217;s why she landed so many roles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

